DRAFT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS
FOR
PROCUREMENT OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES, 2006
S.R.O.
.- In
exercise of powers conferred by section 27 of the Public Procurement
Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 (XXII of 2002), the Public
Procurement Authority is pleased to make the following regulations
namely:- 1.
Short title and commencement.- (1) These regulations may be
called the Public Procurement Regulations for Procurement of Consultancy
Services,2006. (2) They
shall come into force one month after the notification date. GENERAL
PROVISIONS
2.
Definitions.- (1) In these regulations, unless there is
anything repugnant in the subject or context:- (a) “bidding” means
the formal procurement procedure under which sealed bids are invited,
received, opened, examined and evaluated for the purpose of awarding a
contract; (b) “Committee” means
the Consultant Selection Committee of the procuring agency; (c) “Consultant” means
an individual consultant or a consulting firm as the case may be; (d) “Consulting
services” means the provision of independent expert advice of a quality at
least equal to the applicable professional standards in relation to
acquisition of goods, services (other than Consulting Services) and
works; (e) “Request for
proposal (RFP)” means set of bidding documents sent to short listed
Consultants and includes at least:- (i)
letter
of invitation; (ii)
instructions
to Consultants; (iii)
terms
of reference; (iv)
evaluation
criteria; and (v)
the
proposed contract. (f) “Terms
of reference” means defining and elaborating on the objectives and
intended scope of services at the time of invitation of proposals. (2) The
expressions used but not defined in these regulations shall have the same
meanings as are assigned to them in the Public Procurement Regulatory
Authority Ordinance, 2002 and Public Procurement Rules, 2004. 3.
Systems for selection of Consultants.- The selection system
shall be determined by the procuring agency prior to issuance of the
request for proposals from prospective Consultants. A procuring agency may
utilize one of the following systems for selection of Consultants,
namely:- (a)
Quality
based selection (QBS).- This
system will be used for highly specialized and complex assignments, where
quality is the only factor taken into consideration. (b)
Quality
and cost based selection (QCBS).- This
system will be used where high quality is the prime consideration while
cost is a secondary consideration. (c)
Least
cost.- This
system will only be used for assignments of standard or routine nature,
where well established practices and standards exist. (d)
Single
source/direct selection.- This
method will be used only in exceptional cases, where it provides clear
advantage over competition such as:- (i) for
tasks which are natural continuation of previous assignment and where
continuity of technical services is required; (ii) for very small
assignments; (iii) in cases of emergency;
and (iv) where only one Consultant is
qualified or has experience of exceptional worth. (e)
Fixed
budget.- This
system shall be used only when the assignment is simple, can be precisely
defined and when the budget is fixed. The request for proposals shall
indicate the available budget. Proposals that exceed the indicated budget
shall be rejected. The ranking shall be based only on evaluation of
technical proposals of the qualified bidders. 4.
Criteria for eligibility of Consultants.- The
procuring agency shall not hire a Consultant for an assignment in which
there is possibility of conflict of interest. If a Consultant has been
engaged by the procuring agency to provide goods or works for a project,
it shall be disqualified from providing Consulting services for the same
project. Similarly, Consultant should not be hired for any assignment
which by its nature, may be in conflict with another assignment of the
Consultant. 5.
Expression of interest (EOI).- (1) A request for EOI shall
be advertised giving applicants at least two weeks for national
competition and four weeks for international competition to submit their
interest to provide consultancy services. (2) The
EOI shall contain at least the following information:- (a) the name
and address of procuring agency; (b) an
appropriate description of the assignment providing scope of the
intellectual and professional services required; (c) deadline
and place of the submission of the EOIs; and (d) criteria
for short listing or prequalification where required. 6.
Criteria for short-listing of Consultants.- (1)
Whenever short-listing is deemed necessary, the procuring agency shall
predetermine a criteria for short listing. Except for single source, there
will normally be a minimum of three Consultants in the shortlist, but
there is no upper limit for number of candidates to be short listed.
However, if less than three candidates apply, their proposals may be
considered on merit. (2) The
procuring agency while engaged in short listing of Consultants will take
into consideration the following factors, namely:- i)
Qualification; ii)
Experience;
and iii)
Any
other factor that a procuring agency may deem relevant, not inconsistent
with these regulations or
Public Procurement Rules, 2004. (3) All
applicants shall be informed whether or not they have been
short-listed. 7.
Criteria for prequalification of Consultants.- (1)
Whether short-listing is done or not, the procuring agency may engage in
prequalification of Consultants in case of complex assignments.
(2) The
procuring agency while engaged in prequalification of Consultants will
take into consideration the following factors, namely:-
(i)
Qualification;
(ii)
General experience;
(iii)
Specific experience; and
iv)
Any other factor that a procuring agency may deem relevant, not
inconsistent with these regulations or Public Procurement Rules,
2004. (3)
Prequalification of Consultants, where required, shall be processed
in accordance with Rule 16 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004. 8.
Request for proposals (RFP).- (1) The procuring agency shall
use an RFP for seeking proposals from the Consultants which shall include
the following, namely:- (a)
Letter of invitation (LOI).- The LOI shall mention the name
and address of the procuring agency and shall state the intention of the
procuring agency to enter into a contract for provision of Consulting
services. (b)
Instruction to Consultants.- The instructions to Consultants
shall contain all necessary information that would help them prepare
responsive proposals and shall bring as much transparency as possible to
the selection system. (c)
Terms of reference (TOR).- TOR shall unambiguously define
the objectives, goals and scope of the assignment besides conditions of
contract. TOR shall list the services and surveys necessary to carry out
the assignment and expected outputs. (d)
Evaluation criteria.- Except as otherwise provided, the
evaluation of proposals shall be carried out giving due consideration to
quality and cost. (e)
Type of contract.- The procuring agency, depending on the
circumstances, may use one of the following types of contract,
namely:- (i)
Lump
sum contract will be used mainly for assignments in which the content,
duration of the services and the required output are unambiguously
defined; (ii)
Time
based contract will be used when it is difficult to define the scope and
the length of services; (iii)
Hourly
or daily rates will be used for small projects, especially when the
assignment is for less than a month; and (iv)
Any
other, based on combination of the above and including out of pocket
expenses, where required. (f)
Special provisions.- The procuring agency may specify any
other requirement related to the assignment or contract etc where
required. (2) The
procuring agency will invite the prospective Consultants to submit their
technical and financial proposals in separately sealed envelopes. The
procuring agency shall give deadline for submission of proposals.
Consultants shall be given adequate time in which to prepare their
proposals which shall not be less than four weeks. 9.
Selection committee.- (1) The procuring agency shall appoint
only one Committee for short listing or prequalification and selection of
Consultant. The Committee shall comprise of at least three competent
persons from amongst different wings of the organization e.g.
planning/design, audit/account, purchase/store, construction/operation
etc. (2) The
Committee shall advise on short listing and prequalification of
consultants. (3)
Except for single source selection, the Committee shall evaluate
the RFPs in accordance with Rule 36(b) of the Public Procurement Rules,
2004. (4) The
bidder whose technical and financial proposal is the most advantageous
shall be ranked highest and his bid shall be treated as lowest evaluated
bid. 10.
Extent of negotiation.- The
Committee of the procuring agency may negotiate with the highest ranked
bidder regarding methodology, work plan, staffing and special conditions
of the contract. The Committee shall not permit substitution of key staff,
unless both parties agree that undue delay in selection process makes such
substitution unavoidable. Similarly, negotiations shall not seek changes
in the rates quoted by the bidder. In case of failure of negotiations, the
Committee may invite the next ranked bidder. Negotiations by a single
person Committee shall never be allowed. 11.
Professional liability of Consultants.- (1)
The Consultant selected and awarded a contract shall be liable for
consequence of errors or omissions on its part. The extent of liability of
the Consultant should be incorporated in the contract and in no case
should it be less than remunerations excluding the out of pocket expenses,
nor should the liability exceed twice the remunerations. (2) The
procuring agency may demand insurance on part of the Consultant to cover
its liability as stated above, and necessary costs shall be borne by the
Consultant which shall be reimbursed by the procuring agency as out of
pocket expenses by the Consultant. (3)
The
Consultant shall be held liable for all losses or damages suffered by the
procuring agency on account of any misconduct by the Consultant in
performing the consulting services. 12.
Precedence.- The
Public Procurement Rules, 2004 and these regulations are to be taken as
mutually explanatory of one another but in case of discrepancy, the regulations shall take precedence
over the Public Procurement Rules, 2004. |